REVIEWING THE BLIND MAN'S ELEPHANT
What we never hear is someone asking why they think it's shaped like what they feel. And the reason I bring that up is because when we read a book, it's much like feeling the side of the elephant. We are feeling with our eyes, and interpreting the words with our brain unless it's a picture book, we may all see different things even when reading the same book. What we see, we bring to the book review if we are a member. And isn't that what a book club is all about? If one says, I reviewed this book and can understand that this book is like a wall, we have to ask why they think that, not just think... "Well, I thought it was like a rope... or a hose."
For example, I read a book about a girl who was put in foster homes when her mother was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. It tells of her life in each home she had while waiting for her mother to serve her sentence; of the misadventures; of her visits to the prison and such. One who read the book held it in the air and said, I don't know what you others thought of the book, but I didn't see the point. I don't believe all these terrible things could happen to one foster child.
The person reviewing the book... the same one who suggested the book felt like she had been reprimanded. How could she select a book which so badly misrepresented the life of a foster child. Suddenly everyone began questioning it themselves. What this person's statement caused, was for everyone else to think their insights of the book were wrong. That her the critic wielding the book was the correct interpretation. That the book was a severe misrepresentation of the Foster System. Someone who knew of the life of a foster child was like, having been a social worker herself, spoke up and said that this story was as true as many that she had heard. Sometimes terrible things happen. It isn't a perfect system.
The difference from what the book wielder and the reviewer was that they had felt different sides of the elephant.
Next time someone who has read the same book as the group says, "I didn't believe it..." I'm going to ask what was it that you didn't believe. The only one who could tell the blind man for sure what the elephant felt like was the one who saw the whole picture. The social worker was the closest to seeing the total picture of the foster child.
Once when reviewing the book, I did what normally takes a lot of time ...I summed up the book quickly in modern language as I saw the book's story. What I didn't say in the summation, was how beautifully written it was. The book was Madame Bovary. When you just told the story of this spoiled woman, it sounded so trite. What Flaubert had done is to take a soap opera of a story, and because of his powerful descriptions and insights, paying attention to the least detail even to the way a person walked, or the look on a face, his writing was as much a masterpiece as a great painting. What I summarized was merely like saying "This painting is of a eyebrow-less woman with a mysterious smile... if summarizing Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa.
Once I was called to review for another who couldn't make it to the review of The Grass Harp, by Truman Capote, and she wanted me to review Capote as well as the story he wrote. I hadn't remembered to do that, but I had said I would. When someone took me up on that and asked why, I felt like I'd missed the mark. She reminded me that he had quite an immoral life. Later, when I thought about it, I wondered if I'd ever bring his morals into even a review of the author when talking about his book. If I had reviewed the author from just reading this book, I would have said that Capote, as an author, had a way of opening up our eyes to a beauty in characters who wanted to be free to express who they really were, as well as the beauty in nature-of the grasses whispering a tune in the wind like the low notes from a harp, as that's what the author brought to me in this book. I've heard some damning background of many famous artists, authors, and even presidents of the United States. When we are reading a book, or looking at a beautiful piece of art, or appraising what kind of president this man was, we appraise what he's accomplished, and that work if it is of grate value, should not be jaded by the morals of that person, whether an author, artist or leader. The only way we can 'review' an author's life aside from what his written work tells us of his personality, is if it is a biography about him or her.
That's my thoughts for today.
